Shouldn't Prop. 8 have an exception for lipstick lesbians?

The real reason people oppose gay marriage is not religious or civil, it's because they find guy+guy to be icky, yucky.





But the lovely ladies shouldn't be punished for that, should they?Shouldn't Prop. 8 have an exception for lipstick lesbians?
Yes, there should be an exception. I think, however, that blond lipstick lesbianese is something we should hash out in a round table discussion. The medicinal merits of imbibing in such are worthy of evaluation.





On the other hand, some might believe that lesbianese is proof that hell exists because girl on girl is so very, very hawt.Shouldn't Prop. 8 have an exception for lipstick lesbians?
i dunno wut ur talkin about? i dont think anything is rly icky its just wrong...men have penises and girls have vaginas for a reason..its like a puzzle.penis in vagina.. its like a puzzle.. and buttholes are for taking shits and yea the whole point of sex is to reproduce so why would homosexualism be normal? its not...not that i have anything against gays or lesbians but i do of their decisions
Lesbians do not need to be married in order to display their love for each other in a public fashion, preferably broadcast over the internet.





However, I still support their right to get married if they want to.
Apart from my wife, lovely lesbians tend to be few and far between...





EDIT: Silly turtle -- those are ';porn star'; lesbians! The kind that are only gay until the d*ck shows up...
you mean like sarah palin
What about twinks? They look like chicks, shouldn't we let them marry too?

loreal hair